Appeals Court Refuses to Lift Mail Ballot Block

Appeals Court Refuses to Lift Mail Ballot Block

A mail-in ballot rests in a postal tray among other ballot envelopes during sorting.
A mail-in ballot in a US Postal Service tray. A federal appeals court blocked Trump administration restrictions on mail voting before the midterms.Illustration: The Frank

The News

A federal appeals court on Thursday refused to let the Trump administration enforce new Postal Service restrictions on mail-in voting before the November midterms — and seven Republican chief election officials told the Supreme Court the same day that it is simply too late to change the rules.

A federal appeals court in Boston on Thursday declined to lift a lower court's order blocking a new U.S. Postal Service rule that would tighten requirements for mail-in ballots, Reuters reported.

The ruling keeps the restrictions on hold for November's congressional elections while the U.S. Supreme Court weighs a similar request from the administration.

Bloomberg called the decision another setback for the Justice Department as it urges the Supreme Court to step in before the midterms.

The Republican Objection

Earlier Thursday, seven Republican chief election officials urged the Supreme Court not to let President Trump's mail ballot order take effect for November, according to Politico. Their argument is one of timing: with the election weeks away, states cannot rebuild their mail voting procedures now.

Timeline

Sept. 9, 2026

Democratic-led states and voting rights groups suing to block the executive order file briefs at the Supreme Court, warning the policy would have disastrous consequences for the midterms and would bar millions of Americans from voting by mail.

Sept. 10, 2026, morning

Seven Republican chief election officials tell the Supreme Court it is too late to implement Trump's mail ballot order for November.

Sept. 10, 2026, afternoon

The federal appeals court in Boston denies the administration's request to lift the block on the Postal Service rule, leaving it unenforceable for now.

Reactions

The seven Republican election officials, who run elections in their states, told the justices the administration's proposal cannot be put in place in time for November, Politico and Yahoo News reported — a rare public break with the White House from officials in the president's own party.

The Democratic-led states and voting rights groups challenging the order argued in their Supreme Court briefs that it would keep millions of Americans from voting by mail.

The Justice Department has continued to press the Supreme Court to intervene, according to Bloomberg, after a string of losses in the lower courts.

What's Next

The fight now sits with the Supreme Court, which is weighing the administration's request to allow the restrictions to take effect. Until the justices act, the lower court's block stands and the existing mail ballot rules apply for the November midterms.

More

The disputed rule comes out of Trump's executive order restricting mail-in voting, which the Postal Service rule would implement by tightening requirements on mail ballots. Multiple courts have now declined to let it operate while the underlying lawsuits proceed.

Poll

Should the Supreme Court let the mail ballot restrictions take effect before November?

Yes — enforce them now
0.0%
No — it is too close to the election
0.0%
Only after the midterms
0.0%

Colleges Condemn Students Mocking Kirk Assassination Anniversary

Charleston White Arrested Again on Florida Battery Charge

Border Patrol Rescues MS NOW Crew in Desert

Supreme Court Restores Missouri's Old House Map

Alaska Drops Felony Voter Charges Against Samoans

Trespasser Breaches Harris' Malibu Estate; No Arrest

Hegseth Pressed Downed Airmen Into 60 Minutes

Houthis Seize Mokha, Choking Saudi Oil Exports

Altman Rules Out OpenAI IPO This Year

Jury Acquits Lil Durk in Murder-for-Hire Case

Judge: Trump Broke Law Halving FEMA Staff

Maher Calls Democrats' Gaza Genocide Claim a Lie

Blizzard Revives StarCraft, Sends Diablo to Netflix

Trump's Queens Childhood Home Sells for $1.93M

Scientists Find New Virus in Tick Invading US

Britain Bans Settlement Imports; US States Threaten Payback

Prison Fire Kills 7 as Kurds Protest Killing

Kosovo Rallies for Ex-President Before Hague Verdict

Cruz Booed at GameDay Over College Sports Bill

Blast Hits Bulgarian Arms Plant Supplying Ukraine