Judge Voids Trump's 75-Country Immigrant Visa Ban

Judge Voids Trump's 75-Country Immigrant Visa Ban

The News

A federal judge has struck down the Trump administration's policy suspending immigrant visa processing for nationals of 75 countries, ruling it illegal and beyond the secretary of state's power.

U.S. District Judge Jeannette Vargas of the Southern District of New York set the policy aside Friday as "contrary to law and in excess of statutory authority." Vargas is an appointee of former President Joe Biden.

Secretary of State Marco Rubio exceeded his authority by issuing the policy, Vargas ruled, because it "runs afoul" of the Immigration and Nationality Act by mandating "the refusal of visas to eligible applicants without any basis in law."

What the Ruling Actually Does

The policy took effect in January and halted the processing of immigrant visas — the permanent-residence category covering family reunification and employment-based petitions — for nationals of 75 countries. Countries on the list included Afghanistan, Brazil, Egypt, Iran, Iraq, Nigeria, Russia, Somalia, Thailand and Yemen, according to CTV News and PBS NewsHour. Per Wire's reporting on the ruling, tourist and student visas were not covered by the suspension.

The ruling vacates visa denials that rested solely on the nationality policy. Denials grounded in other legal reasons stand.

Vargas wrote that the policy strips consular officers of a role Congress gave them. "Congress imbued these officers with exclusive authority and discretion to determine if an immigrant is eligible for a visa based upon review of specific and detailed criteria set forth in the statute," she wrote. "The Policy, which categorically prohibits the issuance of immigrant visas based upon the nationality of the applicant, represents a direct abrogation of this statutory scheme."

Who Sued

The policy was challenged by two nonprofit organizations along with 11 individuals, PBS NewsHour reported. Six of them had family members refused visas; the other five are outside the United States and had filed employment-based petitions to come here.

Timeline

November:

The State Department issues a broader order tightening rules on immigrants who might become "public charges," according to PBS NewsHour.

January:

The visa suspension takes effect. The State Department says it instructed consular officers to halt immigrant visa applications from the 75 countries under that November order, citing Council of Economic Advisers data that more than 30 percent of households with immigrants from those countries received some form of public assistance.

Friday, Aug. 21:

Vargas vacates the policy.

Saturday, Aug. 22:

The State Department says it is "protecting the American people by upholding the highest standards of screening and vetting of visa applicants," and declines to comment on pending litigation.

Reactions

"We welcome this ruling because, at its heart, this case is about keeping families together," said Anna Gallagher, executive director of CLINIC, one of the nonprofit plaintiffs. "This decision affirms both those values and the rule of law, allowing families to once again move forward toward reunification."

Diana Konate, deputy executive director for policy and advocacy at plaintiff African Communities Together, called the decision "a tremendous victory for the rule of law." She added: "This unlawful and racist ban caused immeasurable harm, cruelly keeping families and loved ones apart."

Conservative outlets hit the ruling hard and focused on the judge. The Gateway Pundit called it an "OUTRAGE" and described a Biden-appointed judge dealing "a sweeping blow" to Trump's America First immigration agenda. Legal Insurrection ran the headline "Biden Judge Blows Up Trump's 75-Country Visa Freeze." RedState framed the struck-down policy as a ban "designed to stop welfare abuse."

What's Next

Both sides must file proposals for resolving the remaining issues in the case by September 11.

The administration can appeal. As of Saturday it had not said whether it will, and the State Department declined to comment on the litigation.

More

The decision is the latest court setback for Trump's immigration agenda. In June, a federal judge struck down a policy that made it harder for immigrants from dozens of countries to enter and stay in the country — touching asylum, work permits, green cards and citizenship applications — saying it threw immigrants' lives "into indeterminate legal limbo," PBS NewsHour reported.

Nineteen outlets across the spectrum covered Friday's ruling, from CNN and PBS NewsHour to Townhall and RedState.

Colleges Condemn Students Mocking Kirk Assassination Anniversary

Charleston White Arrested Again on Florida Battery Charge

Border Patrol Rescues MS NOW Crew in Desert

Supreme Court Restores Missouri's Old House Map

Alaska Drops Felony Voter Charges Against Samoans

Trespasser Breaches Harris' Malibu Estate; No Arrest

Hegseth Pressed Downed Airmen Into 60 Minutes

Houthis Seize Mokha, Choking Saudi Oil Exports

Altman Rules Out OpenAI IPO This Year

Jury Acquits Lil Durk in Murder-for-Hire Case

Judge: Trump Broke Law Halving FEMA Staff

Maher Calls Democrats' Gaza Genocide Claim a Lie

Blizzard Revives StarCraft, Sends Diablo to Netflix

Trump's Queens Childhood Home Sells for $1.93M

Scientists Find New Virus in Tick Invading US

Britain Bans Settlement Imports; US States Threaten Payback

Prison Fire Kills 7 as Kurds Protest Killing

Kosovo Rallies for Ex-President Before Hague Verdict

Cruz Booed at GameDay Over College Sports Bill

Blast Hits Bulgarian Arms Plant Supplying Ukraine