NYC Releases 170,000 Hidden 9/11 Air-Quality Pages

NYC Releases 170,000 Hidden 9/11 Air-Quality Pages

A massive column of smoke rises above lower Manhattan's skyline during the September 11, 2001 attacks.
Smoke rises above New York City after the September 11 attacks. The city released 170,000 pages of air-quality records Tuesday.Illustration: The Frank

The News

New York City released more than 170,000 pages of previously undisclosed post-9/11 air quality records on Tuesday, three days before the 25th anniversary of the attacks, and Mayor Zohran Mamdani said the files show city officials knew the air around Ground Zero was toxic while the public was told it was safe to breathe.

The documents were posted to a public portal the city built as part of a $34 million effort, according to CNN and the Washington Examiner.

They include air quality reports, contamination data gathered by local environmental agencies in the days after the towers fell, and correspondence among city officials — including exchanges about whether the city could be held legally liable for the public's exposure, CNN reported.

What the Records Show

Mamdani said asbestos was found "nearly everywhere" that inspectors tested near Ground Zero.

"These are documents that show what the city knew about toxic air around Ground Zero, when they knew it and how they acted to limit liability," he said at City Hall.

The release includes the long-sought "Harding memo," an October 2001 document written by city lawyers to Bob Harding, then deputy mayor for economic development under Mayor Rudy Giuliani. The New York Post, which first reported the memo in February, says it acknowledged the city could face tens of thousands of lawsuits from people exposed to the toxins. The Washington Examiner reported the memo warned of as many as 35,000 claims, in part because health advisories caused people "to return to the area too soon (causing toxic exposure or emotional harm)."

Other records come from the "68 boxes" of 9/11 health documents that city officials said were not located until 2025, despite years of public-records requests. The initial release also includes documents on 7 World Trade Center, The National Desk reported.

The word "misled" belongs to the records and the reporting on them: CNN said the files show officials knew conditions were unsafe "despite repeated assurances to the public," and Bloomberg reported the documents show officials weighing potential liability from toxic exposure while trying to reassure the public that Lower Manhattan was safe.

Timeline

Sept. 11, 2001

Hijacked planes destroy the World Trade Center towers, killing nearly 3,000 people and blanketing Lower Manhattan in dust and debris.

October 2001

City lawyers write the Harding memo to Deputy Mayor Bob Harding, warning of mass litigation over toxic exposure.

2025

The city locates 68 boxes of 9/11 health-related records stored in a government office. The FDNY union reacted with fury at the sudden discovery, the New York Post reported.

Feb. 5, 2026

The New York Post publishes the Harding memo, reporting the city knew about potential Ground Zero risks.

Sept. 8, 2026

Mamdani announces the release of more than 170,000 pages, appearing with 9/11 families and advocate Jon Stewart. The release stems from a settlement of two lawsuits brought by the watchdog group 9/11 Health Watch.

Sept. 11, 2026

The 25th anniversary of the attacks.

Reactions

"People got sick because the leaders they trusted lied and told them they were safe to breathe in toxic air," Mamdani said. He added: "It is time for this painful chapter to end."

Jon Stewart, who has spent years pressing for care and compensation for responders and survivors, accused the city of moving to protect itself. "There was poison in the air and on the ground and in the window sills and in your air conditioners and covering your pets and your clothes, and it stayed there for months. Everyone knew. And now it's very clear that the city knew as well," he said, adding that "the city began covering their ass three weeks in."

"These people had to fight sick and dying for years," Stewart said of survivors and victims' families at the news conference.

On the right, RedState questioned the timing in a piece headlined "Why Is Mayor Mamdani Dumping 9/11 Files Days Before the Anniversary?"

Bob Hennelly, general manager of WBAI Pacifica Radio, who broadcast live on the day of the attacks, told Democracy Now! that officials rushed to reopen the city despite the health risks. "There was no Zoom back then," he said. "People were ordered back to their desks in Lower Manhattan, which turned out to be a death sentence."

What's Next

City officials said they will keep reviewing and posting records over the next year, redacting personal information before release, The National Desk reported.

The administration also plans to assign staff to help New Yorkers prove they were in the Exposure Zone — a step that could open access to care through the World Trade Center Health Program or money through the September 11th Victim Compensation Fund.

Unresolved: whether any legal or criminal consequences follow from what the documents contain, and how many more people qualify for benefits once the city starts helping them document exposure.

More

The health toll has long outrun the death toll from the day itself. Thousands of people — including responders who worked the site for months — have since died of 9/11-related cancers and other illnesses, CNN reported. More than 360 FDNY members have died of 9/11-related illnesses, more than the number of department members killed responding on the day of the attacks, according to the Washington Examiner.

Doctors at Mount Sinai, who have tracked responders and residents for two decades, are still treating the fallout and are still learning how the toxins released that day can trigger disease years or even decades after exposure, the New York Post reported. New Yorkers who were children near the World Trade Center are now confronting questions about what their exposure means for them, The New York Times reported, as cited by Newsmax.

Poll

Should officials who signed off on the post-9/11 "safe to breathe" assurances face consequences?

Yes — investigate and prosecute
0.0%
Yes, but only public accountability
0.0%
No — 25 years is too late
0.0%
Not until all the records are out
0.0%

Colleges Condemn Students Mocking Kirk Assassination Anniversary

Charleston White Arrested Again on Florida Battery Charge

Border Patrol Rescues MS NOW Crew in Desert

Supreme Court Restores Missouri's Old House Map

Alaska Drops Felony Voter Charges Against Samoans

Trespasser Breaches Harris' Malibu Estate; No Arrest

Hegseth Pressed Downed Airmen Into 60 Minutes

Houthis Seize Mokha, Choking Saudi Oil Exports

Altman Rules Out OpenAI IPO This Year

Jury Acquits Lil Durk in Murder-for-Hire Case

Judge: Trump Broke Law Halving FEMA Staff

Maher Calls Democrats' Gaza Genocide Claim a Lie

Blizzard Revives StarCraft, Sends Diablo to Netflix

Trump's Queens Childhood Home Sells for $1.93M

Scientists Find New Virus in Tick Invading US

Britain Bans Settlement Imports; US States Threaten Payback

Prison Fire Kills 7 as Kurds Protest Killing

Kosovo Rallies for Ex-President Before Hague Verdict

Cruz Booed at GameDay Over College Sports Bill

Blast Hits Bulgarian Arms Plant Supplying Ukraine