Appeals Court Sides With CNN Over Trump

Appeals Court Sides With CNN Over Trump

The News

A panel of appeals court judges on Nov. 18 upheld a ruling against President Donald Trump in a case he brought against CNN.

Trump did not adequately show that CNN defamed him when it reported that he promoted what it described as the “Big Lie” when challenging results from the 2020 presidential election, judges on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit concluded.

Trump said that the phrase was intended to link him to Adolf Hitler and propaganda used by the Nazis in Germany, but the term is ambiguous enough to cast doubt on that allegation, according to the new ruling.

“Trump has not adequately alleged the falsity of CNN’s statements. Therefore, he has failed to state a defamation claim,” the court stated.

Trump had also argued that the district judge should have analyzed more than the five statements he outlined in his complaint, but those statements included CNN’s usage of the Nazi-linked term, the panel said.

Timeline

in 2023

U.S. District Judge Anuraag Singhal in 2023 had dismissed the lawsuit, finding CNN’s usage of the “Big Lie” term was repugnant but not defamatory.

Reactions

“Second, Trump’s argument hinges on the fact that his own interpretation of his conduct—i.e., that he was exercising a constitutional right to identify his concerns with the integrity of elections—is true and that CNN’s interpretation—i.e., that Trump was peddling his ‘Big Lie’—is false. However, his conduct is susceptible to multiple subjective interpretations, including CNN’s,” the per curiam opinion from Circuit Judges Elizabeth L. Branch, Adalberto Jordan, and Kevin Newsom said.

What's Next

The panel also rejected Trump’s attempts to allow him to file an amended complaint or move for reconsideration from Singhal of the decision. The district court acted within its discretion when dealing with motions to amend and reconsider, according to the appeals court.

More

The same court held in a different case that one person’s subjective assessment is not rendered false by another person’s different conclusion.

UMass Dartmouth Running Back, 18, Stabbed to Death

Trump Vows 'AI Force,' Czar; Polls Name Change

Iran Sends Trump Three Conditions to End War

Faulty AI Intel Nearly Started War With China

German General Breuer Elected NATO's Top Officer

Nobel Laureate: War, Sanctions Crushing Iranians

Dutch Police Disperse Violent Far-Right Hague Protest

GOP Midterm Odds Fade With 45 Days Left

Maher Rejects Tarlov's Claim Democrats Are Less Crazy

Patrick Clancy Breaks Silence After Ex-Wife Killed Kids

Trump Cuts Park Staff, Diverts Fees to DC

Holocaust Heirs Sue LA Museums Over Looted Art

Trump's Fed Chair Hikes Rates, Defying White House

Miller Drives Push to Deport Illegal Immigrant Children

US Lifts Sanctions on Eritrea's Military, Ruling Party

Air Force Admits US Has Space Weapons

Turkey Revokes License of Iran's Mellat Bank

Billionaire Ratcliffe Blasts Britain Over Immigration, Taxes

Navajo Nation Flash Flood Kills Three

Explosions Over Riyadh Trigger Saudi Air Alerts