Court Blocks New Texas Congressional Map

Court Blocks New Texas Congressional Map

The News

A panel of federal judges in Texas on Tuesday blocked the state’s new GOP-favored House map from being used ahead of the 2026 midterms by declaring it a likely racial gerrymander, dealing a blow to Republicans who have looked to net extra seats.

In a 2-1 vote, the panel ordered Texas Republicans to use the congressional lines they had in place before they redistricted earlier this year. The new map would have offered Republicans up to five pickup opportunities in the House in 2026.

The ruling is a significant defeat for Republicans, who moved to redraw the Texas map earlier this year. That move kicked off a national redistricting arms race, with California Democrats quickly moving to counter the Texas GOP with their own redrawn maps.

In the ruling, the majority wrote that Texas “immediately jumped on board” and followed through as Trump pushed for additional Republican seats, making the eventual design a likely racial gerrymander.

Reactions

“The public perception of this case is that it’s about politics,” U.S. District Judge Jeffrey Brown wrote for the majority.

“To be sure, politics played a role in drawing the 2025 Map,” he continued. “But it was much more than just politics. Substantial evidence shows that Texas racially gerrymandered the 2025 Map.”

“This ruling is clearly erroneous and undermines the authority the U.S. Constitution assigns to the Texas Legislature by imposing a different map by judicial edict,” Abbott said in a statement.

Democrats quickly celebrated the court ruling.

“A federal court just stopped one of the most brazen attempts to steal our democracy that Texas has ever seen,” Texas House Minority Leader Gene Wu (D) said in a statement.

“Greg Abbott and his Republican cronies tried to silence Texans’ voices to placate Donald Trump, but now have delivered him absolutely nothing.”

The House Democrats’ campaign arm also praised the ruling, with Executive Director Julie Merz in a statement calling it a “a victory for voters across the state of Texas, particularly Black and Brown Texans.”

What's Next

Texas Gov. Greg Abbott (R) quickly vowed to appeal to the Supreme Court, which is already considering wide-ranging questions about racial gerrymandering lawsuits in a long-running battle in Louisiana.

Tuesday’s ruling is the first time a court has blocked any of the new maps, but hearings are scheduled in other states in the coming weeks.

More

Appointed to the bench by President Trump, Brown was joined by U.S. District Judge David Guaderrama, an appointee of former President Obama.

U.S. Circuit Judge Jerry Smith, an appointee of former President Reagan, dissented. His opinion was not immediately filed on the public docket.

Republicans are bracing for a challenging midterm environment, and the redistricting effort — spearheaded by Trump, the White House and other national Republicans — has sought to give the party additional pickup opportunities.

The Texas map, which would have offered the GOP up to five pickup opportunities next year, was the first one that Republicans were able to successfully redraw and pass ahead of 2026. Republicans have also passed new maps in Missouri, North Carolina and Ohio, though litigation could potentially halt new maps elsewhere.

In Texas, the lawsuit was brought by individual voters, the League of United Latin American Citizens, the Texas State Conference of the NAACP, Rep. Jasmine Crockett (D-Texas) and Rep. Al Green (D-Texas), among others.

The Supreme Court has ruled partisan gerrymanders are a political question the court cannot strike down, but the challengers raised claims of racial gerrymandering and vote dilution.

They contested districts around Houston, Dallas–Fort Worth, the Interstate 35 corridor and the Gulf Coast.

Their case largely revolved around a letter Trump’s Justice Department sent Texas this summer contending some of its majority-minority districts were drawn unconstitutionally and urging the state to change their racial composition.

“The map ultimately passed by the Legislature and signed by the Governor—the 2025 Map—achieved all but one of the racial objectives that DOJ demanded,” Brown wrote. “The Legislature dismantled and left unrecognizable not only all of the districts DOJ identified in the letter, but also several other ‘coalition districts’ around the State.”

UMass Dartmouth Running Back, 18, Stabbed to Death

Trump Vows 'AI Force,' Czar; Polls Name Change

Iran Sends Trump Three Conditions to End War

Faulty AI Intel Nearly Started War With China

German General Breuer Elected NATO's Top Officer

Nobel Laureate: War, Sanctions Crushing Iranians

Dutch Police Disperse Violent Far-Right Hague Protest

GOP Midterm Odds Fade With 45 Days Left

Maher Rejects Tarlov's Claim Democrats Are Less Crazy

Patrick Clancy Breaks Silence After Ex-Wife Killed Kids

Trump Cuts Park Staff, Diverts Fees to DC

Holocaust Heirs Sue LA Museums Over Looted Art

Trump's Fed Chair Hikes Rates, Defying White House

Miller Drives Push to Deport Illegal Immigrant Children

US Lifts Sanctions on Eritrea's Military, Ruling Party

Air Force Admits US Has Space Weapons

Turkey Revokes License of Iran's Mellat Bank

Billionaire Ratcliffe Blasts Britain Over Immigration, Taxes

Navajo Nation Flash Flood Kills Three

Explosions Over Riyadh Trigger Saudi Air Alerts