Diddy Trial: Jury Ends 1st Day Without Verdict

The anonymous group was not sequestered throughout the trial and spent the weekend at home following the passionate final pleas from both sides last week.

In its closing argument, the prosecution portrayed Mr. Combs, also known as Diddy or Puff Daddy, as the long-untouchable leader of a criminal enterprise who “used power, violence and fear to get what he wanted,” especially sexually.

The sprawling case presented by prosecutors encompassed two decades of what the government described as criminal behavior, including drug distribution, kidnapping, arson, bribery, sex trafficking, witness tampering and obstruction, interstate transportation for prostitution and forced labor. In its closing argument, the prosecution zeroed in on a few notable examples that it said proved the five counts against him: one count of racketeering, two counts of sex trafficking involving two of his long-term girlfriends, and two counts of transportation to engage in prostitution.

Mr. Combs, 55, faces a sentence that could extend to life in prison if convicted of the most serious charges. He has pleaded not guilty and his lawyers have said that any sex in the case was consensual, as they say was demonstrated in the extensive digital communications entered as evidence.

To convict Mr. Combs of racketeering conspiracy, jurors need to find that he and a co-conspirator worked together to commit at least two instances of criminal acts from the government’s list of examples. Drug distribution alone, the prosecutors argued, was sufficient to convict Mr. Combs of racketeering because they said the trial had shown that he and his employees participated in “hundreds of acts of drug distribution” together.

At the heart of the case is the prosecution’s argument that Mr. Combs coerced two women to have sex with hired escorts while he watched, filmed and masturbated in drug-fueled sessions known as “freak-offs” or “hotel nights.”

The defense has argued that the women — the singer Casandra Ventura, or Cassie, and another girlfriend who testified under the pseudonym “Jane” — were in control of decisions and even enthusiastic about the sexual scenarios. But prosecutors said the sex-trafficking charges could be proven if even one freak-off was achieved by fraud or coercion, including violence, threats or out of financial obligation.

After the formality of the government’s closing argument, the lead lawyer for Mr. Combs presented a more lively and colloquial closing argument in which he said the portrait of Mr. Combs as a criminal mastermind was overblown. With sarcasm that at times elevated to a mocking tone, the lawyer, Marc Agnifilo, attempted to undermine the evidence and testimony connected to what the government had characterized as the kidnappings of a long-term employee and the arson of a romantic rival’s car.

Mr. Agnifilo also worked to reframe the freak-offs as romantic, if nontraditional, “date nights” and the partners who participated in them as women with agency. “No one’s forcing her to do this,” Mr. Agnifilo said of Ms. Ventura. “She’s a woman who actually likes sex — good for her.”

“Take the part out that is inconsistent or not inconsistent with how, you know, many people choose to be intimate, and what you really have left is kind of this beautiful evening,” the defense lawyer added. “I don’t think by any stretch of the imagination this is the only man in America making homemade porn. I’m under the impression that this is a pretty popular thing nowadays. So let’s look at it in the context in which it is in.”