Fired DOJ Pardon Lawyer Sues Over Gibson Guns

Fired DOJ Pardon Lawyer Sues Over Gibson Guns

Stern attorney in a suit standing at a courtroom lectern holding a legal folder

The News

Elizabeth Oyer, the Justice Department's former pardon attorney, sued the department Thursday, alleging she was fired in March 2025 hours after refusing to recommend restoring actor Mel Gibson's gun rights.

Oyer, who reviewed clemency requests for 13 years, says the termination violated federal civil service law, her due process rights, and her First Amendment right to political association.

Gibson lost his gun rights after a domestic violence conviction and had asked the attorney general to restore them.

Timeline

Before the dispute, Oyer's office vetted 95 people with old, nonviolent convictions for possible restoration of gun rights; the list was later cut to nine.

March 6, 2025

Oyer emailed her objections to including Gibson.

March 2025

her termination papers arrived the same day she sent a follow-up memo declining to recommend Gibson, according to the complaint. The memo cited no misconduct and, the suit says, listed no reason permitted under federal law for removing a career senior executive.

Sept. 3, 2026

Oyer filed her complaint in federal court.

Reactions

Oyer's suit argues the firing was void from the start because Pam Bondi, not Todd Blanche, was attorney general in March 2025 — and the department has itself argued in other litigation that a removal by a lower-ranking official is invalid from the outset.

Blanche has said he knew nothing about Gibson when he signed the termination memo, pointing instead to Oyer's recommendations for death-row commutations.

Oyer told senators at Blanche's confirmation hearing that the commutation explanation was the first she had ever heard of it.

The complaint quotes the department's own domestic violence guide, which states that firearm access raises the homicide risk in abusive relationships by 500%.

What's Next

Oyer is asking the court to declare the firing unlawful and restore her to federal service.

The case turns on two questions: whether the Gibson request was the real reason for her removal, and whether a deputy attorney general had legal authority to fire a career executive at all. Federal law requires 30 days' notice and a chance to respond before removing a career senior executive.

More

The dispute is one of the clearest tests yet of whether Justice Department career staff can be removed without the process Congress wrote into civil service law.

Sources: The Hill, The Independent, Raw Story.

UMass Dartmouth Running Back, 18, Stabbed to Death

Trump Vows 'AI Force,' Czar; Polls Name Change

Iran Sends Trump Three Conditions to End War

Faulty AI Intel Nearly Started War With China

German General Breuer Elected NATO's Top Officer

Nobel Laureate: War, Sanctions Crushing Iranians

Dutch Police Disperse Violent Far-Right Hague Protest

GOP Midterm Odds Fade With 45 Days Left

Maher Rejects Tarlov's Claim Democrats Are Less Crazy

Patrick Clancy Breaks Silence After Ex-Wife Killed Kids

Trump Cuts Park Staff, Diverts Fees to DC

Holocaust Heirs Sue LA Museums Over Looted Art

Trump's Fed Chair Hikes Rates, Defying White House

Miller Drives Push to Deport Illegal Immigrant Children

US Lifts Sanctions on Eritrea's Military, Ruling Party

Air Force Admits US Has Space Weapons

Turkey Revokes License of Iran's Mellat Bank

Billionaire Ratcliffe Blasts Britain Over Immigration, Taxes

Navajo Nation Flash Flood Kills Three

Explosions Over Riyadh Trigger Saudi Air Alerts