Judge Cuts Lively's $8M Fee Bid to $400K

Judge Cuts Lively's $8M Fee Bid to $400K

The News

A federal judge ruled Wednesday that Blake Lively can recover about $407,000 in attorneys' fees and costs over Justin Baldoni's dismissed defamation lawsuit — a small fraction of the roughly $8 million she demanded.

Judge Lewis Liman awarded $363,245.40 in attorneys' fees and $44,206.35 in costs. Lively's team had sought $7,495,526.87 in fees and $539,514.01 in litigation costs and expenses.

The judge did not fault her lawyers' billing rates. He found the "number of hours for which Lively seeks reimbursement is unreasonable."

Why She Got Anything

Lively was entitled to fees only because of a 2023 California law written to deter defamation suits filed against people who raise sexual harassment claims — a fee-shifting rule that made Baldoni's dismissed countersuit expensive for his side.

Baldoni's production company had sued Lively for $400 million in defamation after she brought her own claims over the 2024 film "It Ends With Us." Her suit alleged sexual harassment, retaliation and breach of contract, among other charges. His case was dismissed.

Timeline

2024

Lively and Baldoni make "It Ends With Us," the production at the center of the fight.

After Lively sues

Baldoni's side responds with a $400 million defamation lawsuit against her. It is later dismissed.

May 2026

The two sides settle. Neither side pays the other, and Lively drops her sexual harassment claims. The financial terms of the underlying settlement were never disclosed.

Wednesday, Aug. 26, 2026

Liman grants roughly $407,000 of the roughly $8 million Lively sought.

Reactions

Baldoni's team had argued in court that Lively's demand was excessive and that any award should land in the six figures — which is exactly where the judge put it.

Coverage split immediately on what the number means. The New York Post called it a "humiliating blow" to Lively; the Daily Mail noted she won "just five percent" of what she asked for. Variety and NBC News framed it as a fee award in her favor over a lawsuit that was thrown out.

What's Next

Wednesday's ruling appears to be the last legal action between the two parties. With the defamation suit dismissed and the May settlement done, there is no pending claim left to litigate.

The open question is the California statute itself — whether the 2023 fee-shifting law that handed Lively her award draws further challenges in federal court.

More

Because neither side disclosed the settlement's terms, the full economic outcome of the two-year fight remains unknown. The $407,000 is the only publicly known money moving between them.

UMass Dartmouth Running Back, 18, Stabbed to Death

Trump Vows 'AI Force,' Czar; Polls Name Change

Iran Sends Trump Three Conditions to End War

Faulty AI Intel Nearly Started War With China

German General Breuer Elected NATO's Top Officer

Nobel Laureate: War, Sanctions Crushing Iranians

Dutch Police Disperse Violent Far-Right Hague Protest

GOP Midterm Odds Fade With 45 Days Left

Maher Rejects Tarlov's Claim Democrats Are Less Crazy

Patrick Clancy Breaks Silence After Ex-Wife Killed Kids

Trump Cuts Park Staff, Diverts Fees to DC

Holocaust Heirs Sue LA Museums Over Looted Art

Trump's Fed Chair Hikes Rates, Defying White House

Miller Drives Push to Deport Illegal Immigrant Children

US Lifts Sanctions on Eritrea's Military, Ruling Party

Air Force Admits US Has Space Weapons

Turkey Revokes License of Iran's Mellat Bank

Billionaire Ratcliffe Blasts Britain Over Immigration, Taxes

Navajo Nation Flash Flood Kills Three

Explosions Over Riyadh Trigger Saudi Air Alerts