Judge Tosses Musk's Suit Over NY Hate-Speech Law
Judge Tosses Musk's Suit Over NY Hate-Speech Law
The News
A federal judge threw out Elon Musk's lawsuit against New York's social media disclosure law on Wednesday, ruling that "the First Amendment poses no obstacle" to the state forcing platforms to reveal how they handle hate speech.
U.S. District Judge John Cronan, an appointee of President Donald Trump, dismissed X Corp.'s case entirely — with no chance to amend the complaint.
The law, signed in December 2024 by Governor Kathy Hochul, requires social media companies with at least $100 million in annual revenue to disclose how they eliminate hate on their platforms.
What the Law Requires
Covered platforms must file semiannual reports on hate speech, extremism and disinformation, and on the moderation policies they use against them.
The maximum civil penalty for noncompliance is $15,000 per violation, per day.
The Ruling
X leaned on a Ninth Circuit decision that struck down a similar California law. Cronan drew a line between the two: New York, he found, requires only factual disclosure of policies that already exist, not an explanation of the reasoning behind them.
He also rejected X's claim that Section 230 — the federal shield for online platforms — preempts the state requirement.
Timeline
Hochul signs the disclosure law, applying it to social media companies with at least $100 million in annual revenue.
Musk's X Corp. sues in federal court, arguing the reporting mandate violates the First Amendment and is preempted by Section 230.
Cronan dismisses the suit in full, rejecting both the First Amendment and Section 230 arguments.
Reactions
Bloomberg reported the judge's core finding in his own words: "the First Amendment poses no obstacle" to the law.
Raw Story framed the outcome as a Trump-appointed judge unraveling Musk's bid to keep X's moderation practices hidden.
X Corp. has not said publicly whether it will appeal.
What's Next
New York regulators can now enforce the disclosure requirement against X and other large platforms.
The open questions: whether Musk appeals the dismissal to the Second Circuit, and whether other states use the ruling as a template for their own transparency mandates.
Colleges Condemn Students Mocking Kirk Assassination Anniversary
Charleston White Arrested Again on Florida Battery Charge
Sep 13, 2026
Border Patrol Rescues MS NOW Crew in Desert
Sep 13, 2026
Supreme Court Restores Missouri's Old House Map
Sep 13, 2026
Alaska Drops Felony Voter Charges Against Samoans
Sep 13, 2026
Trespasser Breaches Harris' Malibu Estate; No Arrest
Sep 12, 2026
Hegseth Pressed Downed Airmen Into 60 Minutes
Sep 12, 2026
Houthis Seize Mokha, Choking Saudi Oil Exports
Sep 12, 2026
Altman Rules Out OpenAI IPO This Year
Sep 12, 2026
Jury Acquits Lil Durk in Murder-for-Hire Case
Sep 12, 2026
Judge: Trump Broke Law Halving FEMA Staff
Sep 12, 2026
Maher Calls Democrats' Gaza Genocide Claim a Lie
Sep 12, 2026
Blizzard Revives StarCraft, Sends Diablo to Netflix
Sep 12, 2026
Trump's Queens Childhood Home Sells for $1.93M
Sep 12, 2026
Scientists Find New Virus in Tick Invading US
Sep 12, 2026
Britain Bans Settlement Imports; US States Threaten Payback
Sep 12, 2026
Prison Fire Kills 7 as Kurds Protest Killing
Sep 12, 2026
Kosovo Rallies for Ex-President Before Hague Verdict
Sep 12, 2026
Cruz Booed at GameDay Over College Sports Bill
Sep 12, 2026
Blast Hits Bulgarian Arms Plant Supplying Ukraine
Sep 12, 2026
Sep 13, 2026