Trump Admin Sues 15 Judges Over Deportation Block
Trump Admin Sues 15 Judges Over Deportation Block
The News
The Trump administration is suing each of the 15 federal judges from the District of Maryland, alleging that the district issued an illegal order automatically blocking deportations for individuals who file lawsuits before the court.
Russell advanced the order as a way to preserve the court’s jurisdiction or ensure judges can rule on the issue before the individuals are removed from the country.
He also sought to ensure that the individuals filing the petitions were able to participate in court proceedings.
The block remains in effect for two days after the court’s clerk files a notice of the petitioner’s documents.
The administration filed the lawsuit in the District of Maryland but quickly filed a request for the case to be moved to another district or assigned to a judge from a different district within the Fourth Circuit, which includes Virginia, Maryland, North Carolina, and West Virginia.
“Because this court and its judges are named defendants in this case, each judge in the District of Maryland is required to recuse from the matter,” the filing said.
Timeline
Citing a “recent influx of habeas petitions,” Chief Judge George Russell issued a standing order in May targeting illegal immigrant detainees located in Maryland.
If individuals filed petitions, his order would purportedly prevent the administration from altering their legal status or removing them from the continental United States.
That case and two others reached the Supreme Court, which held oral argument on the issue and the scope of judges’ authority on May 15.
Reactions
“Every unlawful order entered by the district courts robs the executive branch of its most scarce resource: time to put its policies into effect,” a June 24 complaint by the Justice Department read.
“In the process, such orders diminish the votes of the citizens who elected the head of the executive branch.”
“The recent influx of habeas petitions concerning alien detainees purportedly subject to improper and imminent removal from the United States that have been filed after normal court hours and on weekends and holidays has created scheduling difficulties and resulted in hurried and frustrating hearings in that obtaining clear and concrete information about the location and status of the petitioners is elusive,” Russell said.
According to the Justice Department, Russell’s order had multiple flaws, including that it doesn’t leave room for judges to consider four factors the Supreme Court set up to weigh whether to block actions or policies.
“Inconvenience to the court is not a basis to enter an injunction, and filings outside normal business hours, scheduling difficulties, and the possibility of hurried and frustrating hearings are not irreparable harms,” the Justice Department said.
The Trump administration argued that the law didn’t allow the type of “novel” relief that Russell was purporting to implement with his order.
What's Next
The Supreme Court is expected to issue an opinion within days or weeks after the lawsuit’s filing on June 24. Its eventual decision could provide clarity on judges’ ability to block Trump’s policies.
It’s unclear how their eventual decision will bear on Russell’s order, if at all.
More
The District of Maryland has multiple locations with judges who have issued injunctions against the administration’s immigration enforcement. It was the venue, for example, for the high-profile lawsuit challenging Kilmar Abrego-Garcia’s deportation under the Alien Enemies Act.
President Donald Trump initially invoked that law in March to expedite deportations of individuals he suspected were part of the Venezuelan Tren de Aragua gang.
The Supreme Court intervened in April, stating that potential deportees should have the opportunity to seek habeas relief, which is a legal mechanism for people to challenge their detention by the government.
Russell’s order pointed to the All Writs Act, which allows courts to issue writs “necessary or appropriate in aid of their respective jurisdictions and agreeable to the usages and principles of law.”
The lawsuit came after months of clashes between the judicial and executive branches, particularly over the Alien Enemies Act and how far judges could go in blocking the president’s policies.
One of the judges named in the administration’s lawsuit, U.S. District Judge Deborah Boardman, issued a nationwide injunction on Trump’s attempt to limit birthright citizenship.
Colleges Condemn Students Mocking Kirk Assassination Anniversary
Charleston White Arrested Again on Florida Battery Charge
Sep 13, 2026
Border Patrol Rescues MS NOW Crew in Desert
Sep 13, 2026
Supreme Court Restores Missouri's Old House Map
Sep 13, 2026
Alaska Drops Felony Voter Charges Against Samoans
Sep 13, 2026
Trespasser Breaches Harris' Malibu Estate; No Arrest
Sep 12, 2026
Hegseth Pressed Downed Airmen Into 60 Minutes
Sep 12, 2026
Houthis Seize Mokha, Choking Saudi Oil Exports
Sep 12, 2026
Altman Rules Out OpenAI IPO This Year
Sep 12, 2026
Jury Acquits Lil Durk in Murder-for-Hire Case
Sep 12, 2026
Judge: Trump Broke Law Halving FEMA Staff
Sep 12, 2026
Maher Calls Democrats' Gaza Genocide Claim a Lie
Sep 12, 2026
Blizzard Revives StarCraft, Sends Diablo to Netflix
Sep 12, 2026
Trump's Queens Childhood Home Sells for $1.93M
Sep 12, 2026
Scientists Find New Virus in Tick Invading US
Sep 12, 2026
Britain Bans Settlement Imports; US States Threaten Payback
Sep 12, 2026
Prison Fire Kills 7 as Kurds Protest Killing
Sep 12, 2026
Kosovo Rallies for Ex-President Before Hague Verdict
Sep 12, 2026
Cruz Booed at GameDay Over College Sports Bill
Sep 12, 2026
Blast Hits Bulgarian Arms Plant Supplying Ukraine
Sep 12, 2026
Sep 13, 2026