Trump Deal Would Hand Yosemite Land to Developer

Trump Deal Would Hand Yosemite Land to Developer

The News

The Trump administration is pushing a land exchange that would give a private developer a strip of land inside Yosemite National Park — something the National Park Service has never done before.

NOTUS reported the deal, citing four people familiar with the discussions and internal agency documents. Park Service staff have been working on it for more than a year at the direction of Interior Department political leadership.

The beneficiary would be a Nevada-based company tied to real-estate developer Jeff Pori's Kingsbarn Realty Capital. The goal, according to NOTUS, is a short private road connecting an 83-acre property Kingsbarn owns just outside Yosemite's western boundary — marketed as "Sanctuary at Yosemite" — to one of the park's central roads, giving it rare private access near an ancient sequoia grove.

The parcel at stake is small: about a quarter-mile strip, per the Washington Examiner's account of the NOTUS report. In exchange, the Park Service would receive land of equal value elsewhere in California.

Timeline

More than two decades:

The Park Service repeatedly rejected similar road proposals for the same property, formerly called Hazel Green Ranch, under the Bush, Obama and Biden administrations. Courts ruled against the previous owner twice.

2025 confirmation hearing:

Interior Secretary Doug Burgum told senators his department would "support and protect every single inch" of national parks.

Spring 2025:

The administration began trying to arrange the exchange with the Nevada company, according to the four people who spoke to NOTUS.

Since then:

Park Service staff have met with Kingsbarn Realty Capital every few weeks on orders from their superiors, NOTUS reported. The process has dragged because the deal is unprecedented and because an equal-value swap requires appraising Yosemite land.

August 2026:

Trump issued a statement pledging to protect "every acre" of public lands.

Aug. 28, 2026:

The NOTUS report goes public and opposition surfaces from conservation groups and Democratic lawmakers.

Reactions

The National Parks Conservation Association said it "strongly opposes" the plan. "This is an attack on the American people that own this national park," said Mark Rose, the group's Sierra Nevada program manager, who noted a court had already rejected a similar road proposal and called the current effort unlawful.

California Sen. Adam Schiff told NOTUS the administration "appears hellbent on moving forward in the face of opposition from the public, Congress and the courts," adding: "We will fight this."

California Sen. Alex Padilla said funding meant to protect natural areas should not be steered toward "an applicant's connections to high-ranking Trump administration officials."

Sen. Jeff Merkley, ranking Democrat on the Senate Appropriations subcommittee that oversees the relevant conservation fund, formally objected to putting the Yosemite project on a list of endorsed projects, according to his office.

A National Park Service spokesman told NOTUS "no final decisions have been made on the matter," and said any deal "would be subject to all applicable federal laws, regulations, and Departmental policies, including required environmental review and public notification processes." The spokesman added that if a proposal advances, the Interior Department "would follow established procedures to ensure appropriate coordination, transparency, and public involvement, consistent with federal law."

Kingsbarn did not respond to NOTUS's request for comment.

What's Next

No exchange can close without an appraisal of the Yosemite parcel and equal-value land offered in return — the step that has slowed the deal so far.

The Park Service says any transaction would trigger environmental review and public notice, which would put the plan in front of the public for the first time.

Congressional Democrats have signaled they will use the appropriations process to block funding, and the conservation groups opposing the swap argue a similar road plan has already been struck down in court — pointing toward another legal fight if the administration proceeds.

More

Federal rules allow the government to trade land to a private company only for land of equivalent value. What makes this deal unusual, the Washington Examiner noted, is the direction of travel: national parks have historically only added territory, not given it up.

UMass Dartmouth Running Back, 18, Stabbed to Death

Trump Vows 'AI Force,' Czar; Polls Name Change

Iran Sends Trump Three Conditions to End War

Faulty AI Intel Nearly Started War With China

German General Breuer Elected NATO's Top Officer

Nobel Laureate: War, Sanctions Crushing Iranians

Dutch Police Disperse Violent Far-Right Hague Protest

GOP Midterm Odds Fade With 45 Days Left

Maher Rejects Tarlov's Claim Democrats Are Less Crazy

Patrick Clancy Breaks Silence After Ex-Wife Killed Kids

Trump Cuts Park Staff, Diverts Fees to DC

Holocaust Heirs Sue LA Museums Over Looted Art

Trump's Fed Chair Hikes Rates, Defying White House

Miller Drives Push to Deport Illegal Immigrant Children

US Lifts Sanctions on Eritrea's Military, Ruling Party

Air Force Admits US Has Space Weapons

Turkey Revokes License of Iran's Mellat Bank

Billionaire Ratcliffe Blasts Britain Over Immigration, Taxes

Navajo Nation Flash Flood Kills Three

Explosions Over Riyadh Trigger Saudi Air Alerts