Two Ohio Governor Candidates Back Flock Camera Bans
Two Ohio Governor Candidates Back Flock Camera Bans

The News
Two of the three candidates for Ohio governor now back bans on Flock cameras, the AI-powered automated license plate readers that police and businesses use to log vehicles in public and store the data in searchable databases.
Democratic nominee Amy Acton would support bipartisan legislation banning Flock's use across Ohio, her campaign spokeswoman told cleveland.com. Libertarian Don Kissick says he would ban the cameras by executive order at one state agency on day one, then push lawmakers for a statewide public-sector ban.
Republican nominee Vivek Ramaswamy has voiced similar misgivings — warning of a "Chinese-style surveillance state" — but has offered few specifics, and his campaign did not answer questions for the cleveland.com story.
Where Each Candidate Stands
Acton — a former state health director from suburban Columbus — "would support bipartisan legislation banning the use of Flock across Ohio," according to campaign spokeswoman Virginia Schaus, who did not specify how stringent a ban Acton favors. Acton also backs a recent bipartisan legislative request that the Ohio Department of Transportation stop approving new license plate readers along state highways and review existing permits.
Kissick — a TV station control-room operator from Ottawa — said he would immediately issue an executive order barring the Ohio Department of Public Safety from using Flock cameras, then seek a statutory ban on any public-sector entity in the state deploying them. He would not seek a ban on private cameras, citing constitutional concerns, but wants "strict limits" on government access to private camera data, including a warrant requirement. "I am unwaveringly opposed to Flock cameras as well as all other ALPRs entering the market," Kissick said. "The threat to civil liberties these cameras pose goes against every principle on which our society was founded."
Ramaswamy — the Columbus-area entrepreneur — has said the cameras must never be used to spy on people in private spaces, including homes and cars: "That has to be respected as a hard boundary." He has not said what specific rules he would pursue as governor.
Timeline
Records cited by critics show Flock systems in Cleveland and Columbus were often used to help federal officials enforce immigration laws; Columbus Mayor Andrew Ginther ordered city police to stop statewide sharing of Flock data after an audit, per WOSU reporting linked by cleveland.com.
Asked about Flock cameras at the Butler County Fair, Ramaswamy says that if government "is able to and does map out every movement you make ... It's not hard to imagine a Chinese-style surveillance state," warning of an "authoritarian surveillance state."
Outgoing Gov. Mike DeWine and Attorney General Andy Wilson publicly back the cameras amid the civil-liberties debate, as do police departments around the state, saying the readers have helped solve serious crimes, recover stolen vehicles and locate missing people.
A bipartisan group of state lawmakers asks ODOT to halt new license plate reader approvals along state highways and review all existing permits.
Republican state Rep. Levi Dean of Xenia announces he will introduce legislation prohibiting government entities from deploying Flock cameras and other "mass surveillance technologies."
Cleveland.com publishes the candidates' answers, the tenth installment in its series on where the 2026 governor candidates stand. Axios reports the same day that Hamilton County has joined a growing list of Greater Cincinnati communities rethinking license plate readers.
Reactions
Kissick was the bluntest of the three, calling the cameras a threat "to civil liberties" that "goes against every principle on which our society was founded."
Acton's position has firmed up quickly. As recently as last week she gave reporters a less definitive answer, noting DeWine's praise for the cameras' crime-solving value and promising only "a very comprehensive overview" of public safety and emergency response. "We're working very closely with our law-enforcement officers to use technology in all the right ways to protect Ohioans," she said then.
Ramaswamy has framed it as solvable with police buy-in: "I've had conversations with law enforcement where we're on the same page about that, and we're going to work together to both combat violent crime and do it on terms that respect our rights."
Supporters of the cameras — including DeWine, Wilson and police departments statewide — say the readers solve serious crimes, recover stolen vehicles and find missing people. Activists in Cleveland and several other Ohio cities argue they let police surveil people who aren't suspected of any crime.
What's Next
Lawmakers from both parties are drafting Flock bills — a public-sector deployment ban, a warrant requirement for law-enforcement searches, and a 10-day data-deletion mandate among them. But bills introduced this late in a session that ends in December usually don't pass, meaning critics would have to reintroduce next session.
That puts the decision on Ohio's next governor, who will have the power to sign or veto whatever reaches the desk. Voters choose in November.
Ohio cities, meanwhile, keep weighing the cameras' public-safety benefits against privacy, data-sharing and surveillance concerns — and ODOT has been asked to freeze new highway permits.
More
Flock Safety, based in Atlanta, and similar companies sell the readers to law enforcement agencies, other government entities and private businesses. The cameras capture license plate numbers and other vehicle information in public spaces and feed searchable databases. They have been installed in thousands of communities nationwide in recent years, including dozens in Ohio.
Cleveland.com asked all three campaigns whether the cameras are a net positive or negative, which specific restrictions they support — data auto-deletion, warrant requirements, location limits, or outright bans including for ICE immigration cases and free-speech activity — and which steps a governor could take unilaterally versus by legislation.
Poll
Should Ohio ban government use of Flock license plate cameras?
Colleges Condemn Students Mocking Kirk Assassination Anniversary
Charleston White Arrested Again on Florida Battery Charge
Sep 13, 2026
Border Patrol Rescues MS NOW Crew in Desert
Sep 13, 2026
Supreme Court Restores Missouri's Old House Map
Sep 13, 2026
Alaska Drops Felony Voter Charges Against Samoans
Sep 13, 2026
Trespasser Breaches Harris' Malibu Estate; No Arrest
Sep 12, 2026
Hegseth Pressed Downed Airmen Into 60 Minutes
Sep 12, 2026
Houthis Seize Mokha, Choking Saudi Oil Exports
Sep 12, 2026
Altman Rules Out OpenAI IPO This Year
Sep 12, 2026
Jury Acquits Lil Durk in Murder-for-Hire Case
Sep 12, 2026
Judge: Trump Broke Law Halving FEMA Staff
Sep 12, 2026
Maher Calls Democrats' Gaza Genocide Claim a Lie
Sep 12, 2026
Blizzard Revives StarCraft, Sends Diablo to Netflix
Sep 12, 2026
Trump's Queens Childhood Home Sells for $1.93M
Sep 12, 2026
Scientists Find New Virus in Tick Invading US
Sep 12, 2026
Britain Bans Settlement Imports; US States Threaten Payback
Sep 12, 2026
Prison Fire Kills 7 as Kurds Protest Killing
Sep 12, 2026
Kosovo Rallies for Ex-President Before Hague Verdict
Sep 12, 2026
Cruz Booed at GameDay Over College Sports Bill
Sep 12, 2026
Blast Hits Bulgarian Arms Plant Supplying Ukraine
Sep 12, 2026
Sep 13, 2026