Whistleblower: ICE Skipped Background Checks in Hiring Surge

Whistleblower: ICE Skipped Background Checks in Hiring Surge

Federal ICE agent in tactical vest raising his hand as if being sworn in at a courtroom podium

The News

A 17-year Immigration and Customs Enforcement veteran who oversaw the vetting of new recruits says the agency put hundreds of improperly vetted agents on the street during last year's hiring surge, creating what he called "grave national security risks."

The whistleblower complaint was filed with the Department of Homeland Security's Office of Inspector General and obtained by The New York Times through a public records request. The Times reported it Thursday, September 3.

The official, a former unit chief who directly oversaw more than 100 employees and evaluated thousands of ICE applicants, described an "unprecedented lowering of standards," according to the Times.

What He Says Was Skipped

According to the complaint as reported by the Times, ICE issued job offers before fingerprint, identity and credit checks were completed — leaving no window for red flags to surface, including whether an applicant appeared in law enforcement databases for criminal violations.

Officials were told to make hiring decisions without a completed security form, without fingerprints and without polygraph testing, the complaint says. That vetting process normally takes seven to 10 days.

The whistleblower also alleged that political appointees skirted background investigations altogether, Raw Story reported, citing the Times.

Recruits went into training without their criminal histories or other basic information verified, The Independent reported. Training itself was cut from roughly 10 weeks to six, meaning new agents could be working before their background checks were finished.

"We chose as an agency to be more convenient rather than thorough," the official told the Times. "By doing so, there was a potential to put lives at risk and to jeopardize national security."

The Hiring Surge Behind It

The surge followed Congress passing President Donald Trump's domestic policy package, which Raw Story reported carried $30 billion in new funding aimed at more than doubling the deportation force with 10,000 new agents.

ICE brought on roughly 12,000 new hires last year while dropping requirements, The Independent reported — lowering the minimum age from 21 to 18 and dropping the college degree requirement, alongside signing bonuses and other financial incentives. The moves more than doubled the agency's workforce.

Timeline

Last summer:

The whistleblower files his complaint with the DHS inspector general, in the thick of the recruiting push.

Ten days later:

A department lawyer questions him for four hours — not about his safety concerns, but about whether he had spoken to reporters — and confiscates his laptop, according to the whistleblower and his attorney, Kevin Owen, as reported by the Times.

Following 10 months:

He is placed on leave over unspecified "allegations of serious misconduct."

July 1, 2026:

ICE returns recruits to 72 days of training, up from 42, scrapping the fast-track program.

July 2026:

He is reinstated with no finding of wrongdoing and retires immediately.

September 3, 2026:

The Times publishes the complaint.

Reactions

A Homeland Security spokesman told The Independent the agency "does not comment on matters regarding personnel who are no longer with the agency," and said the ICE Office of Professional Responsibility "diligently applies the proper personnel vetting regulations, including guidelines for national security, and evaluates all available information for every applicant based on these factors."

The spokesman said applicants may receive a tentative selection letter after an initial application and interview, and that individuals "may receive an offer of temporary status to begin training pending a full background investigation." New hires get "rigorous on-the-job training and mentorship," the spokesman said, adding that "ICE training does not end when recruits graduate from the academy."

The whistleblower, who voted for Trump in both 2020 and 2024, said he still backs ICE's mission but not how it was carried out. "It's a betrayal of the public trust and everybody's trust," he told the Times.

His attorney said the agency's lawyers were not acting in good faith: "My client was of the belief this investigation by the agency's attorneys was in good faith to vet his disclosure. Instead they threatened him and put him on leave," Owen said.

What's Next

The DHS inspector general's office is conducting an audit of ICE's vetting practices, Raw Story reported.

Officers who went through the fast-tracked pipeline are required to take a follow-on course called the Advanced Field Officer Training Program. How long that program runs is unclear.

More

This is the second ICE whistleblower complaint filed last summer to surface. Former ICE lawyer Ryan Schwank, an assistant chief counsel who later taught at the ICE Academy at the Federal Law Enforcement Training Center, alleged in his complaint and in testimony to Congress that the agency relied on a "deficient, defective and broken" set of training courses and gave recruits a "blatantly unlawful order" to force entry into homes without a warrant. The academy is "teaching cadets to violate the Constitution, and they were attempting to cloak it in secrecy," he said. Schwank resigned earlier this year.

Separately, The Intercept reported Thursday that ICE gave new hires access to restricted information on ELITE, a targeting app built for the agency by Palantir, before those hires had passed their background checks, and that the government never published a legally required privacy assessment for the app.

ICE's training and vetting have drawn scrutiny after a series of lethal incidents involving federal agents, including the killings of Renee Good and Alex Pretti in January and of Johan Sebastián Durán Guerrero and Lorenzo Salgado Araujo a week apart in July, The Independent reported. Agent David Brouillette, who fatally shot Guerrero in Maine, was hired in last year's surge; his two ex-wives have accused him in interviews and court filings of a violent past and say ICE never interviewed them before putting him on the street.

Poll

Should ICE agents hired without completed background checks be pulled off duty until vetting is finished?

Yes
0.0%
No
0.0%

UMass Dartmouth Running Back, 18, Stabbed to Death

Trump Vows 'AI Force,' Czar; Polls Name Change

Iran Sends Trump Three Conditions to End War

Faulty AI Intel Nearly Started War With China

German General Breuer Elected NATO's Top Officer

Nobel Laureate: War, Sanctions Crushing Iranians

Dutch Police Disperse Violent Far-Right Hague Protest

GOP Midterm Odds Fade With 45 Days Left

Maher Rejects Tarlov's Claim Democrats Are Less Crazy

Patrick Clancy Breaks Silence After Ex-Wife Killed Kids

Trump Cuts Park Staff, Diverts Fees to DC

Holocaust Heirs Sue LA Museums Over Looted Art

Trump's Fed Chair Hikes Rates, Defying White House

Miller Drives Push to Deport Illegal Immigrant Children

US Lifts Sanctions on Eritrea's Military, Ruling Party

Air Force Admits US Has Space Weapons

Turkey Revokes License of Iran's Mellat Bank

Billionaire Ratcliffe Blasts Britain Over Immigration, Taxes

Navajo Nation Flash Flood Kills Three

Explosions Over Riyadh Trigger Saudi Air Alerts